OCBJ article: “The Waning Days of Sunshine in the Securities Class Action Plaintiffs’ Paradise”

October 23, 2017  |   Recent Posts   |     |   Comments Off on OCBJ article: “The Waning Days of Sunshine in the Securities Class Action Plaintiffs’ Paradise”

 

Jennifer Keller, founding partner, and Jesse Gessin, Senior Counsel at Keller/Anderle LLP, have published an article in the October 16, 2017 issue of the “Orange County Business Journal.”

Excerpt from the article, “The Waning Days of Sunshine in the Securities Class Action Plaintiffs’ Paradise”:

Every public company’s general counsel should know that California courts, rather than their federal brethren, are paradise for securities class action plaintiffs.  The number of securities class actions alleging violations of the Securities Act of 1933 (“the ’33 Act”) filed in California state courts has skyrocketed in the last four years – an astronomical increase of fourteen hundred percent.

For a time, abusive state court class action filings were stymied by two federal statutes: the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”) and the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 (“SLUSA”).  While the PSLRA implemented substantive changes related to pleading, discovery, liability, class representation and fee awards, the goal of the SLUSA was to preclude ’33 Act cases with fewer than fifty class members from being filed in state courts.  These cases are called “covered” class actions.  After the SLUSA, removal of covered class action securities cases to federal court became the norm.  Yet once in federal court, parties continued to fight over remand to state court.  The rub is that the federal courts have ruled unevenly on whether the state courts had subject matter jurisdiction in the first place.

Then came the California Court of Appeal decision in Luther v. Countrywide Financial Corp., 195 Cal. App. 4th 789 (2011).  Luther was a game-changing decision for securities-focused plaintiff attorneys.  Luther held that state courts have concurrent jurisdiction over some covered class action claims filed under the ‘33 Act.  The California Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court declined to review Luther, which opened the floodgates.  The numbers are telling. In the twelve years before Luther, class action claims alleging a violation of the ’33 Act were filed in California state court an average of once every two years.  After Luther, the average number of filings increased to more than seven cases annually, including eighteen filed in 2016 alone.

This fall the United States Supreme Court will hear Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, Case No. 15-1439 (May 24, 2016).  Cyan could be the state court “sunset” for the plaintiff securities bar …

Read the article

Other Posts

  • Kay Anderle named again to list of “Southern California Super Lawyers”
    February 8, 2019

    Kay has been selected annually since 2015. Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from a wide range of practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.

  • Keller/Anderle LLP approved for NAMWOLF membership
    February 5, 2019

    Keller/Anderle LLP has been approved for membership in the National Association of Minority & Women Owned Law Firms (NAMWOLF). Founded in 2001, NAMWOLF is a nonprofit trade association comprised of minority and women owned law firms and other interested parties throughout the United States …

  • Jennifer Keller selected to Top 10 Southern California Super Lawyers
    January 30, 2019

    Jennifer Keller has been named to the “Top 10 Southern California Super Lawyers” list for 2019; she was also selected in 2018. According to Super Lawyers, Ms. Keller was ranked #2 in Southern California …

  • Keller/Anderle case makes list of “Top 10 Most Impressive Defense Verdicts of 2018”
    January 15, 2019

    Courtroom View Network (CVN) recently highlighted the Top 10 Most Impressive Defense Verdicts covered in 2018, which included Christina Chavez v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.  MassMutual was represented by Jennifer L. Keller and Jesse A. Gessin …

  • Jesse Gessin and Jay Barron featured in “The Value of a Strong Narrative” article
    January 3, 2019

    Jesse Gessin, Partner and Jay Barron, Senior Counsel, were featured in the January 2019 issue of “Attorney Journals Orange County.”  Excerpt: “Trials are a matter of inches. Provided you develop and follow a strong narrative and don’t allow yourself or your team to deviate from that narrative, you’re in a significantly stronger position for earning that ‘big win’ for your client” …