Prosecutorial Misconduct

February 12, 2014  |   Uncategorized   |     |   Comments Off on Prosecutorial Misconduct

Jennifer Keller recently spoke in Miami, Florida, to the National Trial Lawyers, Trial Summit on Prosecutorial Misconduct on January 21, 2014.   Some brief notes from her presentation …

Prosecutorial misconduct has been gaining national attention.  Common areas of misconduct include witness intimidation, withholding discovery and concealing the availability of exculpatory evidence. An increasing number of high-profile cases have brought these excesses to the forefront, to the point where it is becoming difficult to ignore the problem any longer.   For example, in one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history, Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska was a horrible victim to the actions of prosecutors.  An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge found that the government team concealed FBI documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens tragically lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later.

Prosecutors inherently have a higher ethical obligation to represent the public at large, not to act in any way that provides an unfair advantage or to maintain an action that should be discontinued.  Yet this responsibility is put at-risk when outside factors can heavily influence the actions of prosecutors.  Money can be a driving factor: some prosecutors are making book deals while in the middle of proceedings, an ethically appalling scenario that entails numerous conflict-of-interest issues; on another front, increasingly federal prosecutors expect to eventually leave their public service in favor of a high salary partnership positions at private firms, so their personal stake can sway actions to the point of doing whatever is necessary to win the case.  To add another layer of complexity to the problem, judges can feel pressured to make light of such “mistakes” for fear of hurting the prosecutor’s career.

What can the defense attorney do to battle these actions?  There are at least two avenues.  First, there are times when acting in advance is possible, when reputations and records indicate your client may be subject to such conduct. Our firm recently had such a case in a murder trial.  We had been warned that in other cases the prosecutor had hidden evidence and threatened witnesses.  Our team scoured records and were able to prepare prophylactic motions to admonish the prosecutor for his conduct.  This put the judge on red alert about the prosecutor.   It is also possible to take concerted actions, sometimes as a group, with the Bar.

Secondly, the defense attorney needs to be able to recognize prosecutorial misconduct when it happens and be able to respond on the spur of the moment.  Be ready for it, expect it and object to it.  Don’t allow the judge to make light of it.

The prosecution always has more power in virtually any matter; the law, facts and even the jury can be on their side.  The assumption is that the power of their position will be used wisely and taken seriously.  While the vast majority of prosecutors do so, increasingly some do not.  It is up to the defense attorney to protect the rights of clients by exposing and dealing aggressively with such reprehensible practices.

Other Posts

  • Jennifer Keller named to 2022 list of “The Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America”
    October 5, 2021

    Jennifer Keller has been named to the 2022 Benchmark Litigation “Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America,” an exclusive list of the top courtroom advocates in the United States. This is the 5th year in a row that Jennifer has been selected. In addition, Ms. Keller was selected to Benchmark Litigation’s “Top 20 Trial Lawyers in California” list for the 4th year in a row (every year since inception of the list).

  • Billionaire Bill Gross found Guilty, Given Jail Time, Assails Esteemed Judge
    October 1, 2021

    “We hope this will end the nightmare our clients have suffered at the hands of the Grosses, but given his behavior today, that hope may be in vain,” says Scolnick.

  • Jennifer Keller and Reuben Camper Cahn selected as “Top 100 Lawyers in California”
    September 16, 2021

    The selection of more than one partner at a firm is remarkable for even the largest law firms and particularly so for a boutique firm,” says managing partner Kay Anderle. “This honor attests to the outstanding capabilities of not just Jennifer and Reuben but other KA attorneys who work behind-the-scenes to achieve success for our clients.” 

  • Best Lawyers® in America names Jennifer Keller Top Orange County Lawyer for White Collar Criminal Defense
    August 25, 2021

    In addition to the “Lawyer of the Year” honor, Ms. Keller was also selected as a Best Lawyer® in the practice areas of Bet-the-Company Litigation, Commercial Litigation, and Litigation-Intellectual Property.  

  • Five KA attorneys selected by Best Lawyers® in America
    August 20, 2021

    Attorneys and their areas of practice selected are: Jennifer Keller for bet-the-company litigation, commercial litigation, intellectual property litigation, and white collar criminal defense; Kay Anderle for commercial litigation, legal malpractice-plaintiffs, and white collar criminal defense; Chase Scolnick for qui tam law and white collar criminal defense; Reuben Camper Cahn for white collar criminal defense; and Shaun A. Hoting for commercial litigation.