Prosecutorial Misconduct

February 12, 2014  |   Uncategorized   |     |   Comments Off on Prosecutorial Misconduct

Jennifer Keller recently spoke in Miami, Florida, to the National Trial Lawyers, Trial Summit on Prosecutorial Misconduct on January 21, 2014.   Some brief notes from her presentation …

Prosecutorial misconduct has been gaining national attention.  Common areas of misconduct include witness intimidation, withholding discovery and concealing the availability of exculpatory evidence. An increasing number of high-profile cases have brought these excesses to the forefront, to the point where it is becoming difficult to ignore the problem any longer.   For example, in one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history, Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska was a horrible victim to the actions of prosecutors.  An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge found that the government team concealed FBI documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens tragically lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later.

Prosecutors inherently have a higher ethical obligation to represent the public at large, not to act in any way that provides an unfair advantage or to maintain an action that should be discontinued.  Yet this responsibility is put at-risk when outside factors can heavily influence the actions of prosecutors.  Money can be a driving factor: some prosecutors are making book deals while in the middle of proceedings, an ethically appalling scenario that entails numerous conflict-of-interest issues; on another front, increasingly federal prosecutors expect to eventually leave their public service in favor of a high salary partnership positions at private firms, so their personal stake can sway actions to the point of doing whatever is necessary to win the case.  To add another layer of complexity to the problem, judges can feel pressured to make light of such “mistakes” for fear of hurting the prosecutor’s career.

What can the defense attorney do to battle these actions?  There are at least two avenues.  First, there are times when acting in advance is possible, when reputations and records indicate your client may be subject to such conduct. Our firm recently had such a case in a murder trial.  We had been warned that in other cases the prosecutor had hidden evidence and threatened witnesses.  Our team scoured records and were able to prepare prophylactic motions to admonish the prosecutor for his conduct.  This put the judge on red alert about the prosecutor.   It is also possible to take concerted actions, sometimes as a group, with the Bar.

Secondly, the defense attorney needs to be able to recognize prosecutorial misconduct when it happens and be able to respond on the spur of the moment.  Be ready for it, expect it and object to it.  Don’t allow the judge to make light of it.

The prosecution always has more power in virtually any matter; the law, facts and even the jury can be on their side.  The assumption is that the power of their position will be used wisely and taken seriously.  While the vast majority of prosecutors do so, increasingly some do not.  It is up to the defense attorney to protect the rights of clients by exposing and dealing aggressively with such reprehensible practices.

Other Posts

  • Kay Anderle named again to list of “Southern California Super Lawyers”
    February 8, 2019

    Kay has been selected annually since 2015. Super Lawyers is a rating service of outstanding lawyers from a wide range of practice areas who have attained a high-degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.

  • Keller/Anderle LLP approved for NAMWOLF membership
    February 5, 2019

    Keller/Anderle LLP has been approved for membership in the National Association of Minority & Women Owned Law Firms (NAMWOLF). Founded in 2001, NAMWOLF is a nonprofit trade association comprised of minority and women owned law firms and other interested parties throughout the United States …

  • Jennifer Keller selected to Top 10 Southern California Super Lawyers
    January 30, 2019

    Jennifer Keller has been named to the “Top 10 Southern California Super Lawyers” list for 2019; she was also selected in 2018. According to Super Lawyers, Ms. Keller was ranked #2 in Southern California …

  • Keller/Anderle case makes list of “Top 10 Most Impressive Defense Verdicts of 2018”
    January 15, 2019

    Courtroom View Network (CVN) recently highlighted the Top 10 Most Impressive Defense Verdicts covered in 2018, which included Christina Chavez v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.  MassMutual was represented by Jennifer L. Keller and Jesse A. Gessin …

  • Jesse Gessin and Jay Barron featured in “The Value of a Strong Narrative” article
    January 3, 2019

    Jesse Gessin, Partner and Jay Barron, Senior Counsel, were featured in the January 2019 issue of “Attorney Journals Orange County.”  Excerpt: “Trials are a matter of inches. Provided you develop and follow a strong narrative and don’t allow yourself or your team to deviate from that narrative, you’re in a significantly stronger position for earning that ‘big win’ for your client” …