Prosecutorial Misconduct
Jennifer Keller recently spoke in Miami, Florida, to the National Trial Lawyers, Trial Summit on Prosecutorial Misconduct on January 21, 2014. Some brief notes from her presentation …
Prosecutorial misconduct has been gaining national attention. Common areas of misconduct include witness intimidation, withholding discovery and concealing the availability of exculpatory evidence. An increasing number of high-profile cases have brought these excesses to the forefront, to the point where it is becoming difficult to ignore the problem any longer. For example, in one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history, Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska was a horrible victim to the actions of prosecutors. An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge found that the government team concealed FBI documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens tragically lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later.
Prosecutors inherently have a higher ethical obligation to represent the public at large, not to act in any way that provides an unfair advantage or to maintain an action that should be discontinued. Yet this responsibility is put at-risk when outside factors can heavily influence the actions of prosecutors. Money can be a driving factor: some prosecutors are making book deals while in the middle of proceedings, an ethically appalling scenario that entails numerous conflict-of-interest issues; on another front, increasingly federal prosecutors expect to eventually leave their public service in favor of a high salary partnership positions at private firms, so their personal stake can sway actions to the point of doing whatever is necessary to win the case. To add another layer of complexity to the problem, judges can feel pressured to make light of such “mistakes” for fear of hurting the prosecutor’s career.
What can the defense attorney do to battle these actions? There are at least two avenues. First, there are times when acting in advance is possible, when reputations and records indicate your client may be subject to such conduct. Our firm recently had such a case in a murder trial. We had been warned that in other cases the prosecutor had hidden evidence and threatened witnesses. Our team scoured records and were able to prepare prophylactic motions to admonish the prosecutor for his conduct. This put the judge on red alert about the prosecutor. It is also possible to take concerted actions, sometimes as a group, with the Bar.
Secondly, the defense attorney needs to be able to recognize prosecutorial misconduct when it happens and be able to respond on the spur of the moment. Be ready for it, expect it and object to it. Don’t allow the judge to make light of it.
The prosecution always has more power in virtually any matter; the law, facts and even the jury can be on their side. The assumption is that the power of their position will be used wisely and taken seriously. While the vast majority of prosecutors do so, increasingly some do not. It is up to the defense attorney to protect the rights of clients by exposing and dealing aggressively with such reprehensible practices.
Other Posts
-
Jennifer Keller Ranked #1 by Super Lawyers 2nd Year in a Row
January 21, 2021
Jennifer Keller, a nationally prominent trial attorney at Keller/Anderle LLP in Irvine, has been ranked the #1 attorney in Southern California by Southern California Super Lawyers. Ms. Keller has now been ranked #1 for two consecutive years, 2020 and 2021.
-
Jennifer Keller named to 2020 list of “California’s Top Women Lawyers”
November 12, 2020
Thee list of “Top Women Lawyers of 2020” is selected by the Los Angeles and San Francisco Daily Journals. This is the twelfth time Ms. Keller has been selected for the Top Women Lawyers award.
-
Keller/Anderle LLP selected to “Tier 1” Commercial Litigation list of “Best Law Firms”
November 5, 2020
Keller/Anderle selected to the U.S. News – Best Lawyers®’ 2021 “Best Law Firms” list. The firm is one of the few on the list that is a Women’s Business Enterprise National Council certified firm (100% women-owned).
-
Jennifer Keller named to 2021 list of “The Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America”
October 14, 2020
Jennifer Keller, a nationally prominent trial attorney at Keller/Anderle LLP in Irvine, has been named to the 2021 Benchmark Litigation “Top 100 Trial Lawyers in America,” an exclusive list of the top courtroom advocates in the United States. This is the 4th year in a row that Jennifer has been selected.
-
Jennifer Keller selected as “Lawdragon Legend,” recognizing 10 years as top 500 lawyer nationwide
October 2, 2020
Jennifer Keller has been selected as a “Lawdragon Legend,” one of only 30 attorneys chosen nationwide in 2020 by Lawdragon. Per Lawdragon, “Keller is hands-down one of the nation’s best trial lawyers – equally adept at litigating a plaintiff’s cause and defending companies against high-stakes claims.”