Prosecutorial Misconduct

February 12, 2014  |   Uncategorized   |     |   Comments Off on Prosecutorial Misconduct

Jennifer Keller recently spoke in Miami, Florida, to the National Trial Lawyers, Trial Summit on Prosecutorial Misconduct on January 21, 2014.   Some brief notes from her presentation …

Prosecutorial misconduct has been gaining national attention.  Common areas of misconduct include witness intimidation, withholding discovery and concealing the availability of exculpatory evidence. An increasing number of high-profile cases have brought these excesses to the forefront, to the point where it is becoming difficult to ignore the problem any longer.   For example, in one of the biggest political corruption cases in recent history, Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska was a horrible victim to the actions of prosecutors.  An extraordinary special investigation by a federal judge found that the government team concealed FBI documents that would have helped the late Stevens, a longtime Republican senator from Alaska, defend himself against false-statements charges in 2008. Stevens tragically lost his Senate seat as the scandal played out, and he died in a plane crash two years later.

Prosecutors inherently have a higher ethical obligation to represent the public at large, not to act in any way that provides an unfair advantage or to maintain an action that should be discontinued.  Yet this responsibility is put at-risk when outside factors can heavily influence the actions of prosecutors.  Money can be a driving factor: some prosecutors are making book deals while in the middle of proceedings, an ethically appalling scenario that entails numerous conflict-of-interest issues; on another front, increasingly federal prosecutors expect to eventually leave their public service in favor of a high salary partnership positions at private firms, so their personal stake can sway actions to the point of doing whatever is necessary to win the case.  To add another layer of complexity to the problem, judges can feel pressured to make light of such “mistakes” for fear of hurting the prosecutor’s career.

What can the defense attorney do to battle these actions?  There are at least two avenues.  First, there are times when acting in advance is possible, when reputations and records indicate your client may be subject to such conduct. Our firm recently had such a case in a murder trial.  We had been warned that in other cases the prosecutor had hidden evidence and threatened witnesses.  Our team scoured records and were able to prepare prophylactic motions to admonish the prosecutor for his conduct.  This put the judge on red alert about the prosecutor.   It is also possible to take concerted actions, sometimes as a group, with the Bar.

Secondly, the defense attorney needs to be able to recognize prosecutorial misconduct when it happens and be able to respond on the spur of the moment.  Be ready for it, expect it and object to it.  Don’t allow the judge to make light of it.

The prosecution always has more power in virtually any matter; the law, facts and even the jury can be on their side.  The assumption is that the power of their position will be used wisely and taken seriously.  While the vast majority of prosecutors do so, increasingly some do not.  It is up to the defense attorney to protect the rights of clients by exposing and dealing aggressively with such reprehensible practices.

Other Posts

  • Jennifer Keller selected as “Top 100” lawyer in California for 13th time
    September 17, 2020

    Jennifer Keller has again been named to the Los Angeles and San Francisco Daily Journals’ list of “The Top 100 Lawyers in California.”  This is her thirteenth appearance on the list.  There are over 220,000 attorneys in California, making Ms. Keller’s achievement that much more remarkable.  The award, one of the California legal profession’s most coveted, is given by the editors of the statewide lawyers’ newspapers “to honor those whose superior achievement and stellar results place them in a super-elite category.”

  • Keller/Anderle announcement: Six attorneys selected by Best Lawyers 2020-21
    August 20, 2020

    Congratulations to Jennifer L. Keller, Kay Anderle, Reuben Camper Cahn, Jesse Gessin, Chase Scolnick, and Shaun A. Hoting for being selected by Best Lawyers® 2020-21.

  • Jennifer Keller selected to nationwide 2020 list of “Top 250 Women in Litigation”
    August 4, 2020

    Jennifer has been selected annually for the award since 2017. According to Benchmark Litigation: The Benchmark Litigation ‘Top 250 Women in Litigation’ is a list of “the most distinguished women in the world of litigation. These women have earned their place amongst the leading female litigators by participating in some of the most impactful litigation matters in recent history as well as by earning the hard-won respect of their peers and clients.”

  • Thank you first responders!
    April 3, 2020

    We appreciate the dedicated first responders who are helping so bravely with the COVID-19 pandemic. Keller/Anderle is pleased to provide lunches to Costa Mesa police and fire departments through Dick Church’s Restaurant. Thank you first responders!

  • Reuben Camper Cahn admitted to American College of Trial Lawyers
    March 20, 2020

    Founded in 1950, the College is composed of the best of the trial bar from the United States and Canada. Fellowship in the College is extended by invitation only. Lawyers must have a minimum of fifteen years trial experience before they can be considered for Fellowship. Membership in the College cannot exceed one percent of the total lawyer population of any state or province.